MABB © ®
One of the positive effects of the Morales government has been the almost total (above 90%) renewal of the old political elite. This group was seen as deeply corrupt and had completely lost touch with the people's political preferences. That was, more or less, the verdict. Instead, new people were elected and appointed who, it was hoped, would change the direction of leadership and make a fresh start.
Well, this was the case, pretty much, in the beginning. However, that renewal had also its negative effects. One major effect was that the people in office now did not have experience in government administration. Most people were very inexperienced local politicians with little experience at the local level. Others had experience in worker's unions leadership, but no administration.
The article I quote now is one example how can the issue of 'experience' turn into a negative effect against the current government. The report talks about the Amauri Samartino case. Samartino was a Cuban dissident living in Santa Cruz, who had criticized severely the relationship between Evo Morales and Fidel Castro. As a result, the government went after him.
In a legal battle, the Bolivian government deported Samartino to Colombia. He was deported by the then Minister of Government, Alicia Munoz. Ms. Munoz was one of those 'new' government officials who were supposed to bring new ideas and, most importantly, no connection with the old corrupt elite. She issued a ministerial decree deporting Samartino.
It turns out however, she was naively wrong. The case got all the way to the Constitutional Court. Last Friday, it ruled that the decree issued by Munoz was unconstitutional, because it violated the rights of foreign national living in Bolivia. This opens the door for a possible return of the Cuban to Bolivia.
Munoz, according to La Razon, made two grossly incompetent mistakes. One was that she based her arguments to deport Samartino on a Supreme Decree (DS 24423) which was found unconstitutional by the same court in 2001. The Supreme Court's opinion was that the DS 24423 violated the equality principle and the freedom of expression right in the Constitution by ruling that foreign nationals could not intervene in national politics. The second mistake was that she ignored she did not have the competence to issue such an order. That competency lies on officials of the Bolivian Immigration Service. She stepped over her boundaries without even looking back twice.
What does that tell us? For the purposes of this post, it simply highlights how much experience is worth when working in the government. That is the only way, I think, one can as reasonably and neutrally as possible explain these rookie mistakes. Even though Ms. Munoz was already a member of parliament and had experience in leading NGOs, she was not a member of the established elite and thus did not have as much experience.
However noble and liberating was to bring new blood into government, we can see experience is immensely important when it comes to govern. Without it, it can come to damaging outcomes, not only for the government but for the country as a whole.